Linguistic terminology terms | LETTER - C
What is a cardinal numeral? |
Definition | |
A cardinal numeral is a numeral of the class whose members are |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A cardinal numeral is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 52 |
|
Crystal 1987 416 |
|
Mish 1991 207 |
What is case? |
Definition | |
Case is a grammatical category determined by the syntactic or semantic function of a noun or pronoun . |
Discussion | ||
The term case has traditionally been restricted to apply to only those languages which indicate certain functions by the inflection of |
||
|
||
|
||
The term is sometimes extended to include such functions expressed by adpositions . |
Example (Japanese) | |
Generic | |
Case is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 53–54 |
|
Anderson, S. 1985 179–180 |
|
Andrews, A. 1985 71–72 |
|
Mish 1991 211 |
|
Kuno 1973 4–5 |
What is cataphora? |
Definition | |
Cataphora is the coreference of one expression with another expression which follows it. The following expression provides the information necessary for interpretation of the preceding one. |
|
This is often understood as an expression “referring” forward to another expression. |
Example (English) | |
Generic | |
Cataphora is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 43 |
What is a causal relation? |
Definition | |
A causal relation is an interpropositional relation in which the situation expressed by some proposition(s) is communicated as bringing about |
|
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of causal relations: | |
Generic | |
A causal relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Longacre 1983 106–107 |
|
, Halliday and Hasan 1976 256–258 |
|
What is a causative? |
Definition | |
A causative is a grammatical or lexical indication of the causal role of a referent in relation to an event or state expressed by a verb . |
Discussion | |
A causative may be indicated by a |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
|
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 44–45 |
|
Faust 1973 70 |
What is causative case? |
Definition | |
Causative case is a case which expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the cause of the situation expressed by the clause . |
Generic | |
Causative case is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Gove 1966 356 |
What is causer as a semantic role? |
Definition | |
Causer is the semantic role of the referent which instigates an event rather than actually doing it. |
Discussion | |
The causer is usually the surface subject of the verb in a sentence. |
Example (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A causer is a kind of | |
Source | |
Larson 1984 199–203 |
What is a center-periphery schema? |
Definition | |
A center–periphery schema is an image schema involving |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A center–periphery schema is a kind of | |
Source | |
Johnson 1987 124–125 |
What is a centrifugal? |
Definition | |
A centrifugal is an expression of place deixis that has a component of meaning indicating movement away from a deictic center . |
Generic | |
A centrifugal is a kind of | |
Source | |
Heath 1980 153 |
What is a centripetal? |
Definition | |
A centripetal is an expression of place deixis which has a component of meaning indicating movement toward a deictic center . |
Example (Archaic English) | |
|
Generic | |
A centripetal is a kind of | |
Source | |
Heath 1980 152 |
What is cessative aspect? |
Definition | |
Cessative aspect is aspect that expresses the cessation of an event or state. |
Generic | |
Cessative aspect is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Nida 1949 168 |
|
What is a chain of illocutionary commitments? |
Definition | |
A chain of illocutionary commitments is a set of illocutionary acts which are ordered by the relationship of commitment between acts. |
Example (English) | |
|
Source | |
What is a circular definition? |
Definition | |
A circular definition is a description of the meaning of a lexeme that is constructed using one or more synonymous lexemes that are all defined in terms of each other. |
Example (lexemes) | ||
|
||
Here is how the circularity can be resolved by the addition of an analytic definition and supplemental information : |
||
|
||
|
What is a circumfix? |
Definition | |
A circumfix is an affix made up of two separate parts which surround and attach to a root or stem . |
|
The morphological process whereby this is achieved is called circumfixation. |
Example (Tuwali Ifugao, Philippines) | |
|
Generic | |
A circumfix is a kind of | |
What is circumfixation? |
Definition | |
Circumfixation is a morphological process whereby an affix made up of two separate parts surrounds and attaches to a root or stem . |
Generic | |
A circumfixation is a kind of | |
What is a classifier? |
Definition | |
A classifier is a word or affix that expresses the classification of a noun . |
Examples (Spanish) | |
In Spanish, the affixes -a and -o classify nouns according to feminine or masculine gender , respectively. Here are some examples of nouns they classify:
|
Generic | |
A classifier is a kind of | |
See also | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 61 |
|
Mish 1991 246 |
What is a clausal implicature? |
Definition | |
A clausal implicature is a quantity implicature which is inferred by an addressee concerning the truth of a proposition expressed in a particular subordinate or coordinate clause . The addressee infers that the proposition may or may not be true. |
|
The complex or compound sentence of which the clause is a part does not indicate whether the proposition expressed by the clause is true or false. |
Discussion | |
There will be another sentence available which would entail that the proposition expressed by the clause is true. This sentence must be identical to the sentence under scrutiny except that, in one of its clauses, an expression has been substituted which is stronger than that used by the speaker. |
Example (English) | ||
|
||
If John were certain to be away, then the expression would have been something like I know John is away. |
||
|
Generic | |
A clausal implicature is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Levinson 1983 136–137 |
|
Gazdar 1979 57, 59–62 |
What is a clause? |
Definition | |
A clause is a grammatical unit that |
|
|
Examples (English) | ||
The following example sentence contains two clauses: The main clause is it is cold and the subordinate clause is although the sun is shining.
|
Generic | |
A clause is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 61–62 |
|
Mish 1991 246 |
What is a clause chain? |
Definition | |
A clause chain is a group of clauses in which |
|
|
Discussion | |
Temporal and causal relations between the clauses are typically signaled. |
Generic | |
A clause chain is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Longacre 1985 263–265 |
|
Longacre 1983 299 |
What is a cleft sentence? |
Definition | |
A cleft sentence is a complex sentence in which a simple sentence is expressed using a main clause and a subordinate clause . In English the prototypical cleft sentence has the following form: |
|
|
|
X can be a constituent of one of many varieties. |
Discussion | |
X and the subordinate clause together carry the same meaning as their corresponding simple sentence . However, the primary focus of the cleft construction is on an element, often marked by intonation, that introduces new information. This element appears either as X or in the subordinate clause. |
Example (English) | ||
|
||
Its corresponding simple sentence is No, I shall ignore his callousness. The primary focus of the cleft sentence may be marked by intonation, as in following sentences: |
||
|
||
|
Generic | |
A cleft sentence is a kind of | |
Kind | |
Here is a kind of cleft sentence: | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 63 |
|
Levinson 1983 182–183 |
|
Sornicola 1988 343–344 |
|
Bromser 1984 327 |
|
Jespersen 1949 147–148 |
|
Delahunty 1984 74–88 |
What is a clitic? (Grammar) |
Definition | |
A clitic is a morpheme that has syntactic characteristics of a word , but shows evidence of being phonologically bound to another word. |
Features | |
|
Discussion | |
A clitic may have a nonclitic alternant. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Kinds | ||
Here are the two kinds of clitics: |
||
|
||
|
Generic | |
A clitic is a kind of | |
Comparison and contrast: clitic versus affix | ||||||||||
Here is a table that compares and contrasts clitics and affixes: |
||||||||||
|
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 64 |
|
Klavans 1982 xi-xiv, 74–76, 83, 93–95, 100–101 |
|
See also | |
What is close future tense? |
Definition | |
Close future tense is a tense that refers to a time shortly after the moment of utterance . |
Discussion | |
Close future tense typically refers to a time within a span ranging through the end of the time culturally defined as "tomorrow." |
Generic | |
Close future tense is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Dahl 1985 121 |
|
Comrie 1985b 94 |
What is a closed class? |
Definition | |
A closed class is a grammatical class of words with limited membership. These words have primarily grammatical meaning. |
Examples | |
|
What is coding time? |
Definition | |
Coding time is the time of |
|
|
Discussion | |
Coding time may be used as the deictic center for expressions of time deixis . |
Example (English) | |
In the following statement, the coding time is Wednesday, April 1st: The coding time is also the deictic center for the statement. ( Fillmore 1975 44, cited by Levinson 1983 74 ) |
Sources | |
Levinson 1983 54,62, 74 |
|
What is collateral information? |
Definition | |
Collateral information expresses a nonevent, something that did not or has not yet happened. |
Kinds | |
|
Source | |
Grimes, J. 1975 :64–70 |
What is a collective noun? |
Definition | |
A collective noun is a noun that refers to a group of entities that may be considered either as individuals or as one larger entity. |
Discussion | |
A collective noun may |
|
Examples (English) | ||||
|
Generic | |
A collective noun is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 68 |
|
Mish 1991 259 |
What is a collocate? |
Definition | |
Collocates are lexemes that co-occur with each other in natural texts. |
Discussion | ||||||||
Collocates may be characterized as follows: |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Collocates may also be characterized as follows: |
||||||||
|
What is comitative case? |
Definition | |
Comitative case is a case expressing accompaniment. |
|
It carries the meaning "with" or "accompanied by." |
Generic | |
Comitative case is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Dixon 1972 12 |
|
Gove 1966 455 |
What is a command? |
Definition | |
Here are two senses for command: |
|
|
Discussion | |
The meaning for the term command does not appear to extend to such utterances as It’s hot in here. This utterance might have the intended perlocutionary effect of getting the addressee to open a window, but it does not have that as a directive illocutionary point. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A command is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 55 |
What is a comment? |
Definition | |
A comment is the portion of a sentence that provides information about the topic . |
Example (English) | |
In the following sentence, I’d like to test-drive it is the comment: |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 69–70 |
|
What is a commissive illocutionary point? |
Definition | |
A commissive illocutionary point is the illocutionary point of a speaker committing to bring about the state of affairs described in the propositional content of the utterance . |
Discussion | |
According to certain analyses, a commissive illocutionary point is one of the five basic purposes that a speaker can have in making an utterance. |
Generic | |
A commissive illocutionary point is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 57 |
What is commissive modality? |
Definition | |
Commissive modality is a deontic modality that connotes the speaker 's expressed commitment, as a promise or threat, to bring about the proposition expressed by the utterance . |
Discussion | |
If the usage of the term commissive modality is extended beyond solely grammaticalized means of expression, it becomes nearly synonymous with commissive illocutionary point . |
Example (English) | |
|
|
This statement is understood as the speaker’s own commitment to avoid delays. |
Generic | |
Commissive modality is a kind of | |
Source | |
Palmer 1986 115–116 |
What is commitment between illocutionary acts? |
Definition | |
Commitment between illocutionary acts is a condition in which the speaker 's commitment to one illocutionary act necessarily means the commitment to some other illocutionary act, regardless of the context of utterance . |
Examples (English) | |
|
Source | |
Searle and Vanderveken 1985 25, 81, 84 |
What is a common noun? |
Definition | |
A common noun is a noun that signifies a nonspecific member of a group. |
Source | |
What is a complement? |
Definition 1 | |
Traditionally, a complement is a constituent of a clause, such as a noun phrase or adjective phrase, that is used to predicate a description of the subject or object of the clause. |
Kinds | |
Here are some kindsof complements under this definition: | |
Definition 2 | |
In generative syntax, a complement is a phrasal or clausal category which is selected (subcategorized) by the head of a phrase. |
Discussion | |
A selected, or subcategorized, phrase is obligatory, as contrasted with adjuncts , which are optional. For instance, the direct object of a transitive verb is obligatory and therefore a complement, whereas adverbial modifiers are generally optional, and therefore non-complements. However, the distinction is not always clear, particularly for oblique arguments. Neither is the distinction clear in languages in which complements can be freely omitted if they are understood from the context. Omission must be distinguished from pronominalization; pronouns may generally be considered to be complements. However, in some languages pronouns have been grammaticalized as verbal affixes , in which case the question of whether they are complements or not becomes a theory-internal question. (See Baker 1996 , chapter one for discussion of this issue.) |
|
The complement/ adjunct distinction cross-cuts the core / oblique distinction, since there are obliques which are complements, and other obliques which are adjuncts. Also, while the subject of a clause is often considered a core argument of the verb, it is not normally considered to be a complement. This is because in most (perhaps all) languages, the subject appears to be a clause-level constituent, rather than a constituent of the verb phrase. However, it should be noted that this argument presupposes that the verb and its object belong to the same phrase-level constituent, while the subject is outside that constituent, an analysis which leaves the status of subject and object in VSO languages unclear. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Nonexamples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A complement is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Mish 1990 269 |
|
Crystal 1985 60 |
|
Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech, and Svartvik 1985 55, 741–742 |
|
Andrews 1985 : 89–92 |
What is a complement clause? |
Definition | |
A complement clause is a notional sentence or predication that is an argument of a predicate . |
Discussion | ||
The term complement clause is extended by some analysts to include clauses selected by nouns or adjectives . |
||
|
Examples | |
|
Nonexamples | |
|
Discussion | |
Relative clauses are not complement clauses. Relative clauses modify a noun phrase, whereas complement clauses are arguments which are selected by a verb, noun, or adjective. In some languages, relative clauses have a gap--a missing NP argument--which is understood to refer to the NP that the relative clause modifies. For instance, in "the person that saw you," the subject of the clause "saw you" is missing, but is understood to be "the person" that the NP as a whole refers to. Complement clauses do not usually have such a gap. For instance, in "the fact that he saw you," the clause "he saw you" does not have any missing arguments. This distinction, however, cannot be used in languages in which it is possible to omit the subject or other clausal arguments freely. This distinction is also not useful in languages which have internally headed relative clauses. |
|
Adverbial clauses are also not complement clauses. Adverbial clauses may modify any verb phrase or sentence, provided they fit semantically, and fill the same role that a purpose, manner, locative or temporal adverb would fill; whereas complement clauses are specifically selected as complements (arguments) by verbs, adjectives or nouns. |
Generic | |
A complement clause is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 60 |
|
Longacre 1985 237 |
|
Noonan 1985 42, 65 |
|
What is complementary distribution? |
Definition | |
Complementary distribution is the mutually exclusive relationship between two phonetically similar segments . It exists when one segment occurs in an environment where the other segment never occurs. |
Discussion | ||
The rationale for complementary distribution comes from one of the principles of phonemics: |
||
|
||
A phoneme is made up of certain features that are basic to it. When this phoneme occurs in certain phonetic environments, one or more of its features may undergo changes caused by those environments. |
Examples (English) | |||||||||
The phones [p] and [pH] are in complementary distribution. [pH] occurs syllable-initially in a stressed syllable, but [p] never does, as demonstrated here: |
|||||||||
|
Examples: Cashinahua (Brazil/Peru) | |||||||||
The phones [b] and [B] are in complementary distribution. [b] occurs only at the beginning of words, while [B] occurs between vowels, as demonstrated here: |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
What is a complementizer? |
Definition | |
A complementizer is a conjunction which marks a complement clause . |
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A complementizer is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 60 |
What is a complex illocutionary act? |
Definition | |
A complex illocutionary act is an illocutionary act that |
|
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of complex illocutionary acts: | |
Generic | |
A complex illocutionary act is a kind of | |
Source | |
What is a complex sentence? |
Definition | |
A complex sentence is a sentence which includes |
|
|
Example (English) | |
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of complex sentence: | |
Generic | |
A complex sentence is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 75 |
|
Mish 1991 269 |
What is a compound? |
Definition | |
A compound is a word containing a stem that is made up of more than one root . |
Example (English) | ||
Blackboard contains a stem that refers to "a large, smooth, usually dark surface on which to write or draw with chalk". However, the stem is made up of two roots, black and board. |
||
|
What is a compound discourse? |
Definition | |
A compound discourse is a discourse that contains sections belonging to two or more kinds of discourse. |
Example (Koine Greek) | |
|
Kind | |
Here is a kind of compound discourse: | |
Generic | |
A compound discourse is a kind of | |
Source | |
What is a compound predicate? |
Definition | |
A compound predicate is a predicate containing two or more coordinate or paratactic verbs or verb phrases . |
Generic | |
A compound predicate is a kind of | |
Sources | |
What is a compound sentence? |
Definition | |
A compound sentence is a sentence composed of two or more coordinate clauses . |
Generic | |
A compound sentence is a kind of | |
Source | |
Lyons 1968 266 |
What is a compulsion schema? |
Definition | |
A compulsion schema is a force schema that involves an external force physically or metaphorically pushing, or tending to push, an object. |
Examples (English) | |
The experiences of being pushed by
|
Generic | |
A compulsion schema is a kind of | |
Source | |
Johnson 1987 45 |
What is conceptual extendedness? |
Definition | |
Conceptual extendedness is a semantic relationship between senses of a lexeme as currently recognized by speakers of a language. |
|
The progressive derivation of more figurative senses from the basic literal sense can be divided into three stages: |
|
In LinguaLinks, a sense in the lexical database may be classified by one of these categories to help in comparing it with other senses. The relationship of a particular sense to the primary sense, however, is somewhere on a continuum of conceptual extendedness. The classification is subjective, therefore, and should not be considered precise. |
Examples: English verb (rake) | |
|
Sources | |
Neufeldt 1991 108, 110 |
Nonexample: English noun (bank) | |
Here is a nonexample of conceptual extendedness as illustrated by the English noun bank using only the primary senses of each lexeme: |
|
|
|
These three lexemes were semantically related in Old High German. However, an English speaker today would not consider them to be semantically related at all, even though the words sound the same and are written the same. They are therefore considered to be homographs rather than three senses of the same lexeme. |
What is a concession relation? |
Definition | |
A concession relation is a relation of unexpectedness between propositions . Some proposition(s) in the relation are expressed as unexpected (the contraexpectation ) in light of some other proposition(s) (the concession ). |
Examples (English) | |
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of concession relations: | |
Generic | |
A concession relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Hollenbach 1975 17–18 |
|
Longacre 1983 134–135 |
|
Mann and Thompson 1987b 13–16 |
|
Konig 1986 237 |
|
What is a concrete noun? |
Definition | |
A concrete noun is a noun that refers to what is viewed as a material entity. |
Generic | |
A concrete noun is a kind of | |
Sources | |
What is a conditional relation? |
Definition | |
A conditional relation is a logical relation in which the illocutionary act employing one of a pair of propositions is expressed or implied to be true or in force if the other proposition is true. |
Examples (English) | ||||
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of conditional relations: | |
Generic | |
A conditional relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Beekman and Callow 1974 303–304 |
|
Halliday and Hasan 1976 258–259 |
|
Mann and Thompson 1987b 65–66 |
|
Johnson-Laird 1986 61–64 |
|
Comrie 1986 89 |
|
Haiman 1986 218–219 |
|
Ford and Thompson 1986 363–365 |
|
What is a conjunction? |
Definition | |
A conjunction is a word that |
|
|
|
A conjunction is positionally fixed relative to one or more of the elements related by it, thus distinguishing it from constituents such as English conjunctive adverbs . |
Examples (English) | |
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of conjunctions: | |
Generic | |
A conjunction is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 80 |
|
Hartmann and Stork 1972 48–49 |
|
Mish 1991 277–278 |
What is a conjunctive adverb? |
Definition | |
A conjunctive adverb is an adverb that functions like a conjunction by expressing the relationship between independent sentences . |
Discussion | |
In English, a conjunctive adverb’s position in a sentence is flexible. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A conjunctive adverb is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 65 |
|
Mish 1991 278 |
What is a conjunctive illocutionary act? |
Definition | |
A conjunctive illocutionary act is a complex illocutionary act that consists of the performance of two or more illocutionary acts in one utterance . |
Example (English) | ||
The following illocutionary act consists of an assertion and a question:
|
Generic | |
A conjunctive illocutionary act is a kind of | |
Source | |
What is a conjunctive verb? |
Definition | |
A conjunctive verb is a verb form which is used specifically in a conjoined clause . |
Discussion | |
A conjunctive verb has a verb form which differs from that of the clause to which it is conjoined. |
Generic | |
A conjunctive verb is a kind of | |
Source | |
Bybee 1985 187 |
What is a connective? |
Definition | ||
Here are two senses of connective: |
||
|
Examples (English) | ||
|
||
|
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 66 |
|
Rudolph 1988 97–98, 110–111 |
What is a consonant? |
Definition | |
A consonant is a sound made by a partial or complete closure of the vocal tract. |
Discussion | ||
A consonant is produced by an interaction between a passive articulator and an active articulator. The active articulator is brought into contact with or in close proximity to the passive articulator. |
||
Here are the two parameters for identifying consonants: |
||
The production of consonants can be modified. For more information, |
||
|
See also | |
What is a consonant modification? |
Definition | |
A consonant modification is an addition or alteration to the basic way that a consonant is articulated. |
What is a constituent? |
Definition | |
A constituent is one of two or more grammatical units that enter syntactically or morphologically into a construction at any level. |
Examples (English) | |
The sentence You eat bananas contains the following constituents: Immediate constituents
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of constituents: | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 68 |
|
Mish 1991 281 |
What is a construction? |
Definition | |
A construction is an ordered arrangement of grammatical units forming a larger unit. |
Discussion | |
Different usages of the term construction include or exclude stems and words. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A construction is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 85–86 |
|
Mish 1991 281 |
|
Fleming 1988 263 |
What is a container metaphor? |
Definition | |
A containment metaphor is an ontological metaphor in which some concept is represented as |
|
|
Examples (English) | ||
|
||
|
Generic | |
A container metaphor is a kind of | |
Source | |
Lakoff, G. and Johnson 1980 29–30, 51 |
What is a containment schema? |
Definition | |
A containment schema is an image schema that involves a physical or metaphorical |
|
|
Discussion | |
A containment schema can have additional optional properties, such as |
|
|
Generic | |
A containment schema is a kind of | |
Source | |
Johnson 1987 21-22 |
What is the context of an expression? |
Definition | |
The context of an expression or a text is the social situation in which something is said. It includes any information relevant to understanding the appropriate use of an expression or the interpretation of a text. |
Discussion | |
The context of an expression answers the following questions: |
|
|
Examples: Speech registers in Javanese (Indonesia) | |
In Javanese, the social context of an expression is very important. The difference in social status between the speaker and the hearer determines the choice of speech register. |
|
Formal register |
|
When speaking to someone with a higher status, you use a formal register. |
|
|
|
Informal register |
|
When speaking to someone with a lower status, you use an informal register: |
|
|
|
Note that both expressions mean the same thing. It is, therefore, very important in data collection to record the social context of an expression. |
Source | |
Anderson, S. and Keenan 1985 274–275 |
What is a continuant? |
Definition | |
A continuant is a sound produced with an incomplete closure of the vocal tract. |
Discussion | |
All vowels and fricatives are continuants. |
Antonym | |
The antonym of a continuant is | |
stop . |
Source | |
Crystal 1991 :80 |
What is a continuer? |
Definition | |
A continuer is a move that returns speakership to another participant. |
|
It shows that the speaker |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A continuer is a kind of | |
Source | |
Greatbatch 1988 411 |
What is continuous aspect? |
Definition | |
Continuous aspect is an imperfective aspect that expresses an ongoing, but not habitual, occurrence of the state or event expressed by the verb . |
Example (Quechua) | ||
The word -sa expresses continuous aspect, as in the following example:
|
Kind | |
Here is a kind of continuous aspect: | |
Generic | |
Continuous aspect is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Comrie 1976a 12, 26 |
|
Dahl 1985 94 |
|
What is a contoid? |
Definition | |
A contoid is a sound made with enough closure of the oral cavity to produce audible friction in the mouth. |
|
It has the potential to be analyzed phonemically as a consonant. |
Instances | ||||||||||||||||||
Contoids are pronounced with different manners of articulation. |
||||||||||||||||||
Here is a table showing examples of different manners of articulation for contoids: |
||||||||||||||||||
|
See also | |
What is a contraction relation? |
Definition | |
A contraction relation is an interpropositional relation in which information previously expressed is partially restated. |
Example (English) | ||
I won’t go to see him, I just won’t go.
|
Kind | |
Here is a kind of contraction relation: | |
Generic | |
A contraction relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Longacre 1983 20, 121 |
|
What is contrast in analogous environments? |
Definition | |
Contrast in analogous environments is the difference between two phonetically similar segments that occur in two separate words and have similar adjacent sounds. |
Discussion | |
If neither segment has been modified or affected by its environment , the segments are separate phonemes . |
Examples (Kaiwa, Brazil) | |
The segments [p] and [b] contrast in analogous environments in the following words: |
|
|
|
The implication is that /p/ and /b/ are separate phonemes. |
See also | |
What is contrast in identical environments? |
Definition | |
Contrast in identical environments is the difference between two phonetically similar segments that occur in two separate words and have identical adjacent sounds. |
|
If neither segment has been modified or affected by its environment , the segments are separate phonemes . |
Examples (English) | |
The segments [l] and [r] contrast in identical environments in the following minimal pair . |
|
|
|
The implication is that /l/ and /r/ are separate phonemes. |
Examples (Cashinahua, Peru/Brazil) | |
The segments [s ] and [S] contrast in identical environments in the following minimal pair: |
|
|
|
The implication is that /s/ and /S/ are separate phonemes. |
See also | |
What is a contrast relation? |
Definition | |
A contrast relation is an interpropositional relation which expresses that a difference between one proposition and another is relevant. |
Examples (English) | ||||
Some uses of the following words signify a contrast relation:
|
Kind | |
Here is a kind of contrast relation: | |
Generic | |
A contrast relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Longacre 1983 83–85, 88 |
|
Bickford and Daly 1996 100–102 |
|
Halliday and Hasan 1976 247, 252 |
|
Mann and Thompson 1987b 74–75 |
What is contrastive analysis? |
Definition | |
Contrastive analysis is an inductive investigative approach based on the distinctive elements in a language. |
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of contrastive analysis: | |
|
What is conventional implicature? |
Definition | |
Conventional implicature is an implicature that is |
|
|
Example (English) | |
|
Generic | |
Conventional implicature is a kind of | |
Source | |
Levinson 1983 127–128 |
What is a conventional metaphor? |
Definition | |
A conventional metaphor is a metaphor that is commonly used in everyday language in a culture to give structure to some portion of that culture’s conceptual system. |
Examples (English) | ||||
|
||||
|
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of conventional metaphors: | |
Generic | |
A conventional metaphor is a kind of | |
Source | |
Lakoff, G. and Johnson 1980 66, 139 |
What is a conventional metonymy? |
Definition | |
A conventional metonymy is a metonymy that is commonly used in everyday language in a culture to give structure to some portion of that culture’s conceptual system. |
Examples (English) | ||||
|
||||
|
Source | |
Lakoff, G. and Johnson 1980 35–36, 38, 66, 139 |
What is conversation analysis? |
Definition | |
Conversation analysis is an approach to the study of natural conversation, especially with a view to determining the following: |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
Here are some examples of conventional settings in which conversation analysis could take place: |
|
|
Generic | |
A conversation analysis is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Levinson 1983 294–296 |
|
Hopper, Koch, and Mandelbaum 1986 169–170, 173 |
What is conversational implicature? |
Definition | |
Conversational implicature is a nonconventional implicature based on an addressee’s assumption that the speaker is following the conversational maxims or at least the cooperative principle . |
Kinds | |
Here are some kinds of conversational implicatures: | |
Generic | |
Conversational implicature is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Levinson 1983 101–104, 113–114 |
|
Grice 1975 45–46, 49–50 |
|
Crystal 1985 153 |
What is a conversational maxim? |
Definition | |
A conversational maxim is any of four rules which were proposed by Grice 1975 , stating that a speaker is assumed to make a contribution that |
|
|
Discussion | |
The conversational maxims, along with the cooperative principle , partly account for conversational implicatures . |
Sources | |
Levinson 1983 101–104, 113–114 |
|
Grice 1975 45–46, 49–50 |
|
Crystal 1985 153 |
What is the cooperative principle? |
Definition | |
The cooperative principle is a principle of conversation that was proposed by Grice 1975 , stating that participants expect that each will make a “conversational contribution such as is required, at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of the talk exchange.” |
Discussion | |
The cooperative principle, along with the conversational maxims, partly accounts for conversational implicatures . Participants assume that a speaker is being cooperative, and thus they make conversational implicatures about what is said. |
Example (English) | ||
When a speaker makes an apparently uninformative remark such as “War is war,” the addressee assumes that the speaker is being cooperative and looks for the implicature the speaker is making.
|
Sources | |
Levinson 1983 101–104, 110–114 |
|
Grice 1975 45–46, 49–50 |
|
Crystal 1985 153 |
What is a coordinate clause? |
Definition | |
A coordinate clause is a clause belonging to a series of two or more clauses which |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A coordinate clause is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 92 |
|
Mish 1991 288 |
|
What is a coordinating conjunction? |
Definition | |
A coordinating conjunction is a conjunction that links constituents without syntactically subordinating one to the other. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Kind | |
Here is a kind of coordinating conjunction: | |
Generic | |
A coordinating conjunction is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 76 |
|
Mish 1991 288 |
What is a copula? |
Definition | |
A copula is an intransitivity verb which links a subject |
|
|
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A copula is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 93 |
|
Mish 1991 289 |
|
Crystal 1980 213 |
|
Mish 1991 696 |
What is a core argument? |
Definition | |
A core argument of a verb is a subject , direct object , or indirect object . |
Examples | |
In John gave a donation to the Salvation Army, the core arguments are John, a donation, and Salvation Army. |
See also | |
What is coreference? |
Definition | |
Coreference is the reference in one expression to the same referent in another expression. |
Example (English) | |
In the following sentence, both you's have the same referent: |
Generic | |
A coreference is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1980 93 |
|
What is a correction relation? |
Definition | |
A correction relation is an antithesis relation in which the speaker's expression of positive regard reinforces, redefines, or corrects one or the other of the contrasted propositions or groups of propositions. |
Examples (English) | ||||
|
Generic | |
A correction relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Dijk 1981 270–271, 279–280 |
What is a correlative conjunction? |
Definition | |
A correlative conjunction is either of a pair of coordinating conjunctions used in ordered fashion. Typically, one is used immediately before each member of a pair of constituents . |
Example (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A correlative conjunction is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Mish 1991 293 |
What is a count noun? |
Definition | |
A count noun is a noun whose possible referents are thought of as separate entities. |
|
It thus has the ability |
|
|
|
It does not have the ability, however, to occur with a determiner such as much. |
Discussion | ||
Some nouns permit treatment as either count or mass nouns . |
||
|
Examples (English) | |
The word farmer is an example of a count noun, as evidenced by the acceptability of the following expressions:
However, the expression much farmer is not acceptable. |
Generic | |
A count noun is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Crystal 1985 79 |
|
Mish 1991 298 |
What is a counteragent as a semantic role? |
Definition | |
A counteragent is the semantic role of a force or resistance against which an action is carried out. |
Generic | |
A counteragent is a kind of | |
Source | |
What is a counterfactual conditional relation? |
Definition | |
A counterfactual conditional relation is a conditional relation in which the form of expression of the antecedent and consequent marks them as imagined, nonfactual states or events. |
Discussion | |
Comrie 1986 :89–90 establishes that the putative English counterfactuals do not contain the nonfactuality of either the antecedent or the consequent as part of their inherent meaning. Thus, If you gave me a kiss, I’d buy you a beer does not express the impossibility of either the kiss or the beer. Additionally, in If the butler had done it, we would have found just the clues that we did in fact find, it is clear that the consequent is factual, and factuality of the antecedent is possible. |
Example (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A counterfactual conditional relation is a kind of | |
Sources | |
Longacre 1983 110 |
|
Longacre 1985 245–246 |
|
Comrie 1986 89–90 |
|
Crystal 1985 79–80 |
What is a counterforce schema? |
Definition | |
A counterforce schema is a force schema that involves the active meeting of physically or metaphorically opposing forces. |
Examples (English) | |
The experiences of
|
Generic | |
A counterforce schema is a kind of | |
Source | |
Johnson 1987 46 |
What is a cycle schema? |
Definition | |
A cycle schema is an image schema which involves repetitious events and event series. |
|
Its structure includes the following: |
|
|
|
The schema often has superimposed on it a structure that builds toward a climax and then goes through a release or decline. |
Examples (English) | |
|
Generic | |
A cycle schema is a kind of | |
Source | |
Johnson 1987 119–121 |